
MONDAY: Mathematically, this task involves a nice context, though one that is perhaps not so familiar to today's school students  you might therefore have to tease out the crucial fact that audio tape has to travel at a constant speed (as it passes over the tapehead which picks up the sound). Most students will realise that as the left hand spool unwinds, the width (diameter) of the reel of tape decreases. This means the circumference also decreases and so each successive turn of the spool will feed out less and less tape. So if the tape passes the tapehead at a constant speed, the spool will rotate more and more quickly, and the width of the reel will decrease more and more rapidly.
This task should generate rich classroom discussion about these geometric aspects of the context and about the shape of the graph: the graph clearly slopes downwards, but is it a straight line?
As the width of the reel of tape decreases more and more rapidly (over time), the slope of the graph gets progressively steeper (the gradient is negative throughout). This raises interesting questions about the slope near points A and B. Could it be horizontal at A and vertical at B? [Well, no, not quite...] And if we continue the curve, where might it cut the xaxis, and what would this mean in terms of the context?
Note: The curve through A and B is a parabola. It turns out that it passes roughly through the point (76, 0) and that the relationship between M minutes and W mm, is given by M ≂ 76 – (W²/30) [or, more precisely, W = 78.83 – (12W²/345)*, if we assume the given measurements are accurate].
*You might like to verify this formula (please correct me if I've got it wrong).

Note 2: Here is an alternative wording for the task. Would this be better?
TUESDAY: In this task we assume that the pile of sand keeps its exact shape as it gets bigger. Students might initially think that if the time for which the sand flows is doubled (from 1 minute to 2 minutes), then the height of the pile will be doubled too. (It turns out that it takes 8 minutes rather than just 2, for the height to reach 2 metres  something we look at in Wednesday's task.)
However, it shouldn't take much discussion for students to realise that as the pile gets higher it gets wider too, so ever more sand is needed to raise the height by a given amount. This means that the graph will consist of a curve with an ever flatter positive slope. In turn this means that at the 2 minute mark, the height of the graph will be substantially less than 2 (m). However, at this juncture we wouldn't expect students to have a more precise sense of what that height will be. This is something we consider in a more analytic way in Wednesday's task.

WEDNESDAY: We consider what the height of the pile of sand will be after 2 minutes, and use this information to draw a more accurate graph, which we then use to interpolate the height at 2 minutes.
If we double the height of the pile of sand, from 1 m to 2 m, we also double the width (in two dimensions), so we have 2×2×2 = 8 times as much sand as before, so it will take 8 times as long to produce.
A good approximation for the value of the height at 2 minutes is 5/4. This is close to the cuberoot of 2, since (5/4)cubed is 125/64 = 1.953125.

THURSDAY: We step onto a travelator and think about some (nice, simple, straight line) distancetime graphs.

FRIDAY: We relate our distancetime graphs to speedtime graphs. This may not be easy  they look so very different!
Before thinking about the speedtime graph for Mario, it is interesting to consider how students might arrive at the red line  ie the distancetime graph for Mario while he is walking on the travelator. One way would be to find a specific point [such as (10, 14)] and join it to (2, 2) with a straight line. Another way would be to consider the distance travelled each second on the travelator  namely 0.5 m due to the travelator, plus 1 m due to the fact that Mario is walking at 1 m per second relative to the surface of the travelator  so the red line has a slope of 1.5 (m per sec).
Marco's and Mario's speeds are constant for most of the time (except for the brief moments when their speeds change). This means their speedtime graphs will consist primarily of horizontal straight lines. As such, the graphs look very different from the distancetime graphs, where the increase in distance (from Lisa) over time is shown by the upward slope of the graphs. In contrast to this, on the speedtime graphs, the increasing distance is shown by the increase in area under the graphs as the time increases. This looks far less dramatic.